Saturday, November 10, 2012

Interactive Whiteboards for the Smallest !?


Children between five and six are known as digital natives. They are born into a world where technology is a present, not anymore to imagine without, factor. Like many other kindergarten and schools in the world do the Abbotsleigh Junior  (Preston & Mowbray, 2008) and the Westlake Elementary (Sumell, 2012) school use interactive whiteboards for the teaching and learning process. Special about those children is that in comparison with older students they still lack some basic competences, that are often required for formal learning before (e.g. reading comprehension).

First of all it is important to know what an interactive whiteboard  actually is?
An interactive whiteboard can show the picture from of a monitor on a huge touch screen, so it can be controlled via the computer or the whiteboard screen itself. Teachers and students can use the boards in various ways, for example: to write something done with an electronic pen and erase it afterwards (SMART-Technologies, 2004).

How to use an interactive whiteboard?

Pros
An interactive whiteboard allows already children in very young age to learn in a playfully, intuitively way. The board supports different learning styles: Visual-spatial, auditory and kinaesthetic learners. Further it is helpful for students with special needs, like ADD, deaf, hearing-impaired, blind or visually impaired students. Especially for young children, it is necessary to be integrated in the way of gaining knowledge. “Kindergarten children have a short attention span and need to be kept actively involved to promote learning“ (Preston & Mowbray, 2008, p. 51). Thus, we can conclude that they have the motivation to learn, but did not develop the necessary tools to handle various relations yet.

Cons
One of the most negative aspects are the costs. The price for the interactive whiteboard and the equipment is approximately 5000$. Further the costs for hardware and updates have to be taken into account. A problem that occurred in the Junior School was that when only one child could be actively involved, some of the other children got sad. But even that could be counted as a positive aspect, through the waiting the children learn to be patient.

Thoughts
If there is a way to cover the purchase price and the fixed expenses for an interactive whiteboard, it can be a very useful learning tool. In my opinion are interactive whiteboard a great opportunity to give already children in a very young age the chance to learn. The motor skills of that children might not be that developed so that writing on a paper is quiet challenging, but the interactive whiteboard gives them the chance to learn and develop certain skills, especially to the enormous size. The size is also a big advantage for teaching children with special needs.

Interactive whiteboard experiences of a kindergarten teacher (Moore, 2012)

References

Moore, T. (2012). Ed Tech: Smart Board. retrieved November 10, 2012 from

Preston, C., & Mowbray, L. (2008).  Use of SMART Boards for teaching, learning and assessment in kindergarten science. Hands on, 54(2), retrieved November 10, 2012 from
http://smartboardita.pbworks.com/f/smartboard+with+kindergartener.pdf

SMART'-Technologies. (2004), Interactive Whiteboards and Learning: A review of
Classroom Case Studies and Research Literature (White Paper). retrieved November 10, 2012 from http://www.smartboard.se/files/white_papers/research_whitepaper_smart_board_.pdf

Sumell, S. (2012).Westlake Elementar y pacing high-tech push. Thousands Oaks Acornretrieved November 10, 2012 from http://www.knopnews2.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=6255:ed-tech-smart-board&Itemid=105

5 comments:

  1. Paula, I'm really excited because I have found a potential solution to low-cost smart boards! Now all the kindergartners can have smart boards with a little ingenuity. While surfing the net tonight, I came across a series of You Tube videos by Johnny Chung Lee, an applied sciences researcher with Microsoft who earned a PhD from Carnegie Mellon. This particular video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=BE&v=5s5EvhHy7eQ) details how to MAKE a multi-touch smart board with software, an LED pen, a laptop, a standard projector, and an infrared camera, which in this case is a Wii remote (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wii_Remote). The software is available for free on Mr. Chung's website: http://johnnylee.net/projects/wii/. Furthermore the project is featured in a forum where individual users have added their troubles and feedback (http://www.wiimoteproject.com/wiimote-whiteboard/low-cost-multi-point-interactive-whiteboards-using-the-wiimote/?PHPSESSID=0c5e0c9252e813dab43564a345c3032d). Overall this looks like a fairly easy-to-implement method with a little tech-savvy and patience. However I don't see primary school teachers seeking this out nor modding their own tech products. Too bad, though, because this is fantastic and CHEAP.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As a secondary school teacher, I was using a smartboard the latest 2 years. I can say it is a very usefull tool for educators and especially interesting for the students since it lets them to interact and activelly participate during courses.
    In my school there are four smartboards which can be used by all educators. Due to their high cost it was impossible to be installed in every classroom so we had to share them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The meanings attached to innovation by those involved in the instructional process is a possible creator of mismatch between innovation objectives and the current level of technology integration (Van den Berg,Vandenberghe, & Sleegers, 1999). The personal willingness of teachers to adopt and integrate
    innovations into their classroom practice is an important factor (Ghaith & Yaghi, 1997). In addition, beliefs will play a leading role in whether or how it is adopted and implemented (Czerniak & Lumpe, 1996). As suggested by Niederhauser and Stoddart (2001), teachers use technology in ways that are consistent with their personal beliefs about curriculum and instructional practice. As supported by the findings of the study by Yuan and Lee (2012) which aims at investigating elementary school teachers’ perceptions toward to the use of ICT ( Magic Board,an interactive web-based environment specifically),researchers need to develop easy-to-use tools so that the teacher does not need to spend extra time and energy learning to use the technology.Personally as a teacher,I agree with that statement.Having to spend hours or even days and lots of effort may discourage some teachers and create negative feelings towards the innovative tool.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Please note that "SMART board" is a trademarked brand name of the company Smart Technologies. When you are not talking about the specific models of these company, you should use a generic term, such as interactive whiteboard.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hello, thanks for your comments!

    @ Cathryn: I think it is amazing how Mr. Chung developed almost the same technique with such simple tools for little money. But probably you are right and in real life, it will be difficult to implement.
    @ Georgia: I also spoke with teachers, who worked in their school with interactive whiteboards, most of them very really excited about them. They worked not in a primary, but in a school with children with special needs.Many of their pupils often have fine motoric difficulties, so that the big projected screen was very helpful.
    @Asli: I agree with you, that teachers should not to be forced to use this software. But I think especially young primary school teachers might be really enthusiastic to use this kind of new technology and also learn how to use it.
    @ Prof. Questier: Thanks for the remark, I changed it in the more general term interactive whiteboards.

    ReplyDelete